When the election rains out and how bad weather excludes marginal voters from turning out

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Full Text

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,17 MB, PDF-dokument

Ostensibly random and trivial experiences of everyday life, e.g., local weather, can have significant political consequences. First, we present a comprehensive meta-analysis of 34 studies of electoral turnout and rainfall – the vast majority demonstrating a negative association. Secondly, we present a new analysis of a voter panel with validated turnout for a complete electorate merged with fine-grained meteorological observations to show that Election Day rainfall reduces turnout by 0.95 percentage points per centimeter, while more sunshine increases turnout. Marginal voters (young voters) are up to six times more susceptible to bad weather and respond more positively to pleasant weather. Thus, bad weather exacerbates unequal democratic participation by pushing low-propensity voters to abstain. Efforts to include marginal voters therefore ought to be intensified during poor weather, and elections could even be moved to seasons with more pleasant weather to improve participatory equality.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer102573
TidsskriftElectoral Studies
Vol/bind81
ISSN0261-3794
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Previous versions of this paper were presented at the 2022 Midwest Political Science Association (MPSA) Annual Conference in Chicago, the 2021 American Political Science Association (APSA) annual meeting in Seattle, and the 2021 Danish Political Science Association (DPSA) annual meeting in Vejle. We thank all panel participants as well as Brad Gomez, Jens Olav Dahlgaard, Christoffer Dausgaard, Frederik K. Larsen, and the four anonymous reviewers.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 338943687