How deliberation makes better citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

How deliberation makes better citizens : The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro. / Hansen, Kasper Møller; Normann Andersen, Vibeke.

I: European Journal of Political Research, Bind 46, Nr. 4, 2007, s. 531-556.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansen, KM & Normann Andersen, V 2007, 'How deliberation makes better citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro', European Journal of Political Research, bind 46, nr. 4, s. 531-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x

APA

Hansen, K. M., & Normann Andersen, V. (2007). How deliberation makes better citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro. European Journal of Political Research, 46(4), 531-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x

Vancouver

Hansen KM, Normann Andersen V. How deliberation makes better citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro. European Journal of Political Research. 2007;46(4):531-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x

Author

Hansen, Kasper Møller ; Normann Andersen, Vibeke. / How deliberation makes better citizens : The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro. I: European Journal of Political Research. 2007 ; Bind 46, Nr. 4. s. 531-556.

Bibtex

@article{029b08b09c2511dcbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "How deliberation makes better citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro",
abstract = "This article presents results from a Danish national Deliberative Poll on the single European currency. A representative sample of 364 Danish citizens assembled to deliberate on Denmark's participation in the single currency. As a quasi-experiment, the Deliberative Poll is an example of deliberative democracy. Four research questions regarding these deliberative processes are analyzed: openness and access, the quality of deliberation, efficiency and effectiveness, and publicity and accountability. The participants' responses reflect a deliberative process characterized by considerable changes in political opinions as the Poll proceeds, increase in level of knowledge and an improved ability to form reasoned opinions. A mutual understanding on the subject matter prevailed among the participants. At the same time, self-interest and domination also appeared during the deliberative process. The article emphasizes the need for further elaboration of the theory of deliberative democracy so that it better reflects these features of {\textquoteleft}real-life' politics.",
author = "Hansen, {Kasper M{\o}ller} and {Normann Andersen}, Vibeke",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "531--556",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How deliberation makes better citizens

T2 - The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro

AU - Hansen, Kasper Møller

AU - Normann Andersen, Vibeke

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article presents results from a Danish national Deliberative Poll on the single European currency. A representative sample of 364 Danish citizens assembled to deliberate on Denmark's participation in the single currency. As a quasi-experiment, the Deliberative Poll is an example of deliberative democracy. Four research questions regarding these deliberative processes are analyzed: openness and access, the quality of deliberation, efficiency and effectiveness, and publicity and accountability. The participants' responses reflect a deliberative process characterized by considerable changes in political opinions as the Poll proceeds, increase in level of knowledge and an improved ability to form reasoned opinions. A mutual understanding on the subject matter prevailed among the participants. At the same time, self-interest and domination also appeared during the deliberative process. The article emphasizes the need for further elaboration of the theory of deliberative democracy so that it better reflects these features of ‘real-life' politics.

AB - This article presents results from a Danish national Deliberative Poll on the single European currency. A representative sample of 364 Danish citizens assembled to deliberate on Denmark's participation in the single currency. As a quasi-experiment, the Deliberative Poll is an example of deliberative democracy. Four research questions regarding these deliberative processes are analyzed: openness and access, the quality of deliberation, efficiency and effectiveness, and publicity and accountability. The participants' responses reflect a deliberative process characterized by considerable changes in political opinions as the Poll proceeds, increase in level of knowledge and an improved ability to form reasoned opinions. A mutual understanding on the subject matter prevailed among the participants. At the same time, self-interest and domination also appeared during the deliberative process. The article emphasizes the need for further elaboration of the theory of deliberative democracy so that it better reflects these features of ‘real-life' politics.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 531

EP - 556

JO - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 1564114