Decline, adaptation and relevance: political parties and their researchers in the twentieth century
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Decline, adaptation and relevance : political parties and their researchers in the twentieth century. / Gauja, Anika; Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina.
I: European Political Science, Bind 20, Nr. 1, 03.2021, s. 123-138.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Decline, adaptation and relevance
T2 - political parties and their researchers in the twentieth century
AU - Gauja, Anika
AU - Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - The sub-field of political party research is an interesting case study of the broader development of the discipline of political science over the past 20 years as it demonstrates the reflexive and evolving relationship between politics researchers and the organizations that they study. Party research has moved on from crises of existence, to studying the resilience and adaptation of these organizations with new and evolving methodologies that have taken party research into the twenty-first century and fostered more collaborative, specialist and increasingly internationalized relationships within the research community. In the last two decades, expectations around research engagement and impact have heightened in response to changes in the research funding environment and the political pressure to demonstrate the ongoing relevance of the discipline has intensified. The increasingly heterogeneous, specialized and quantified nature of the subfield has enabled party scholarship to find impact and relevance through the provision of technical advice to parties and policymakers, thereby affecting how parties organize. However, while political party researchers have been able to engage audiences outside academia with this specialized and technical advice, the sub-discipline has shifted away from some of the “bigger picture”, normative questions surrounding the role of parties in modern representative democracies.
AB - The sub-field of political party research is an interesting case study of the broader development of the discipline of political science over the past 20 years as it demonstrates the reflexive and evolving relationship between politics researchers and the organizations that they study. Party research has moved on from crises of existence, to studying the resilience and adaptation of these organizations with new and evolving methodologies that have taken party research into the twenty-first century and fostered more collaborative, specialist and increasingly internationalized relationships within the research community. In the last two decades, expectations around research engagement and impact have heightened in response to changes in the research funding environment and the political pressure to demonstrate the ongoing relevance of the discipline has intensified. The increasingly heterogeneous, specialized and quantified nature of the subfield has enabled party scholarship to find impact and relevance through the provision of technical advice to parties and policymakers, thereby affecting how parties organize. However, while political party researchers have been able to engage audiences outside academia with this specialized and technical advice, the sub-discipline has shifted away from some of the “bigger picture”, normative questions surrounding the role of parties in modern representative democracies.
KW - Methods
KW - Party change
KW - Party research
KW - Political parties
KW - Research field history
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100936135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1057/s41304-020-00312-8
DO - 10.1057/s41304-020-00312-8
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85100936135
VL - 20
SP - 123
EP - 138
JO - European Political Science
JF - European Political Science
SN - 1680-4333
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 261530794